by Prop » 25 Sep 2021 Read
Serious question. In my eyes Jimmy was a huge part of the game in the 80s, 90s, and has remained a household name to this day. Granted, he isn’t as competitive now as he once was, but he’s built an incredible legacy, and because of that will always be a giant of the game.
What do you think?
-
Prop
- Posts: 25956
- Joined: 16 December 2015
- Highest Break: 65
- Walk-On: Papua New Guinea - FSOL
by Andre147 » 25 Sep 2021 Read
Never a world champion, but the people's champion. Enough said.
-
Andre147
- Posts: 41804
- Joined: 09 October 2011
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie and Luca
- Highest Break: 27
- Walk-On: Spies - Coldplay
by SnookerEd25 » 25 Sep 2021 Read
Who puts bums on seats like Jimmy?
Ron - of course, Alex Higgins back in the day; but after that you're struggling. these are the top 3 crowd pullers in snooker history - even Davis and Hendry are left behind in those stakes.
Giants all
-
SnookerEd25
- Posts: 18673
- Joined: 10 October 2011
- Location: West London
- Snooker Idol: Cliff Wilson
- Highest Break: 53
- Walk-On: Play with Fire (Rolling Stones)
by Pink Ball » 25 Sep 2021 Read
I did a run-down of the 50 most iconic snooker players of all time a couple of years back. Jimmy White was fifth. Not only is he a giant of the game, he's one of the biggest giants.
-
Pink Ball
- Posts: 22333
- Joined: 07 April 2015
- Location: Galway city, Ireland
- Snooker Idol: You are a banker
- Walk-On: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkfgIUiCiUQ
by HappyCamper » 26 Sep 2021 Read
Aye. Of course he is.
-
HappyCamper
- Posts: 18798
- Joined: 05 November 2018
- Location: Edinburgh
- Snooker Idol: Graeme Dott
- Walk-On: Banana Chips by Shonen Knife
by Prop » 26 Sep 2021 Read
Thanks for the responses
-
Prop
- Posts: 25956
- Joined: 16 December 2015
- Highest Break: 65
- Walk-On: Papua New Guinea - FSOL
by RunningSide » 26 Sep 2021 Read
100% a great player for many years, always entertaining at the expense of winning some huge matches. Playing on because he loves snooker, don't think we'll see another like him when he eventually calls it a day
-
RunningSide
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: 19 September 2021
- Location: Sheffield
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie Mark Williams
- Highest Break: 79
- Walk-On: Anything by Cure.
by orky » 26 Sep 2021 Read
Answer is defo yes. One of the all time greats of the game of that there is no doubt. Yes not the most dedicated in his younger/prime years but that's what made him special. Will always be in the top 10 list or thereabouts of all time great snooker players.
-
orky
- Posts: 118
- Joined: 20 March 2021
by Granite » 27 Sep 2021 Read
No.
ZERO world titles and a big choker where it mattered the most. If he had 10% of Selby's mental strength he'd have won world titles.
-
Granite
- Posts: 299
- Joined: 04 May 2021
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 34
by Iranu » 27 Sep 2021 Read
Granite wrote:No.
ZERO world titles and a big choker where it mattered the most. If he had 10% of Selby's mental strength he'd have won world titles.
Being a giant of the game in this context isn’t about titles won as much as impact, how well known the player is, how they’re viewed by peers and later generations, things like that.
Is he an all-time great? Absolutely not. Is he a giant of the game? Absolutely. To this day he’s (righty or wrongly) a bigger draw than 99% of the tour in terms of crowds.
How many snooker players have had even one video game with their named in the title?
-
Iranu
- Posts: 41460
- Joined: 24 January 2010
- Walk-On: Fort Knox - Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds
by SnookerFan » 28 Sep 2021 Read
He's not really that tall.
-
SnookerFan
- Posts: 150917
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by Scooper » 28 Sep 2021 Read
Jimmy could still win.
-
Scooper
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: 15 February 2016
-
Holden Chinaski
- Posts: 30188
- Joined: 26 July 2013
- Location: Belgium
- Snooker Idol: The Belgiums
- Walk-On: A little less conversation - Elvis
by Iranu » 28 Sep 2021 Read
Nice tattoo of Wildey on Jimmy’s chest.
-
Iranu
- Posts: 41460
- Joined: 24 January 2010
- Walk-On: Fort Knox - Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds
by csprince » 28 Sep 2021 Read
Iranu wrote:Granite wrote:No.
ZERO world titles and a big choker where it mattered the most. If he had 10% of Selby's mental strength he'd have won world titles.
Being a giant of the game in this context isn’t about titles won as much as impact, how well known the player is, how they’re viewed by peers and later generations, things like that.
Is he an all-time great? Absolutely not. Is he a giant of the game? Absolutely. To this day he’s (righty or wrongly) a bigger draw than 99% of the tour in terms of crowds.
How many snooker players have had even one video game with their named in the title?
rightly.
-
csprince
- Posts: 7620
- Joined: 01 December 2018
- Snooker Idol: DING JUNHUI
- Highest Break: 97
- Walk-On: WHEN DOVES CRY
by Johnny Bravo » 28 Sep 2021 Read
Iranu wrote:Granite wrote:No.
ZERO world titles and a big choker where it mattered the most. If he had 10% of Selby's mental strength he'd have won world titles.
Being a giant of the game in this context isn’t about titles won as much as impact, how well known the player is, how they’re viewed by peers and later generations, things like that.
Is he an all-time great? Absolutely not. Is he a giant of the game? Absolutely. To this day he’s (righty or wrongly) a bigger draw than 99% of the tour in terms of crowds.
How many snooker players have had even one video game with their named in the title?
-
Johnny Bravo
- Posts: 7402
- Joined: 24 November 2016
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie O Sullivan
- Highest Break: 122
by RunningSide » 28 Sep 2021 Read
Don't understand why a genuine snooker fan can't appreciate Jimmy's impact on the game, perhaps not old enough to see him playing in his prime but he continued what Alex Higgins had started. If selby had surfaced in the early 80s the game would be finished and you'd have 16 players playing in some working mens club for the WC.
-
RunningSide
- Posts: 2065
- Joined: 19 September 2021
- Location: Sheffield
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie Mark Williams
- Highest Break: 79
- Walk-On: Anything by Cure.
by csprince » 28 Sep 2021 Read
of course he is.no2 in the davis dominant years and again with hendry.10 ranking titles when there wasn't a packed calendar.uk and masters champion 6 world finals.not sure what else he has to do to be considered a great/legend. winning the world title isn't the be all and end all.you judge a player on their career as a whole. what they achieve what there peers and fans think of them. the legacy they leave to the sport.not how many world titles they win.
-
csprince
- Posts: 7620
- Joined: 01 December 2018
- Snooker Idol: DING JUNHUI
- Highest Break: 97
- Walk-On: WHEN DOVES CRY
by orky » 28 Sep 2021 Read
He is 100% an all time great and if anyone begs to differ they probably don't understand the game of snooker and/ or evolution. Players like him and Davis would have produced a far higher standard of play had they been born 10/15/20 years later than what they were. As mentioned Jimmy has won 10 rankers at a time when there were just a couple of rankers a season in the early eighties, certainly not 15/20 we have these days and players choosing which events they enter. Winning the Masters plus of course those 6 world finals along with his style of play and impact on the game for future generations definitely cements his place in history as an all time snooker great. Ask all the players I'm sure he will hover around the top 10 mark of best snooker players ever.
-
orky
- Posts: 118
- Joined: 20 March 2021
by Iranu » 28 Sep 2021 Read
orky wrote:He is 100% an all time great and if anyone begs to differ they probably don't understand the game of snooker and/ or evolution. Players like him and Davis would have produced a far higher standard of play had they been born 10/15/20 years later than what they were. As mentioned Jimmy has won 10 rankers at a time when there were just a couple of rankers a season in the early eighties, certainly not 15/20 we have these days and players choosing which events they enter. Winning the Masters plus of course those 6 world finals along with his style of play and impact on the game for future generations definitely cements his place in history as an all time snooker great. Ask all the players I'm sure he will hover around the top 10 mark of best snooker players ever.
He’s not an all-time great but he’s a giant
-
Iranu
- Posts: 41460
- Joined: 24 January 2010
- Walk-On: Fort Knox - Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds
by orky » 28 Sep 2021 Read
If we are talking about impact on the game I would probably have him at number 2 maybe behind Alex Higgins and ahead of Steve Davis, but that's mainly because of when they all turned pro. If you are asking if Jimmy is/was a giant of the game, 100% yes, if you are asking if he's an all time great, again I would say 100% yes. Is he one of the top 10/12 best players ever to have the played the game? Again I would say 100% yes. I will contradict myself slightly by saying it's very hard to compare players from different eras, the game has moved on almost unrecognisably from when players like Davis and White were youngsters/ in their prime.
-
orky
- Posts: 118
- Joined: 20 March 2021
by orky » 28 Sep 2021 Read
What do you base you base your opinion on when you say he's not an all time great? Be interesting to know, not having a dig. He's defo an all time great but I can understand people under the age of 30 thinking he shouldn't be an all time great.
-
orky
- Posts: 118
- Joined: 20 March 2021
by Iranu » 28 Sep 2021 Read
orky wrote:If we are talking about impact on the game I would probably have him at number 2 maybe behind Alex Higgins and ahead of Steve Davis, but that's mainly because of when they all turned pro. If you are asking if Jimmy is/was a giant of the game, 100% yes, if you are asking if he's an all time great, again I would say 100% yes. Is he one of the top 10/12 best players ever to have the played the game? Again I would say 100% yes. I will contradict myself slightly by saying it's very hard to compare players from different eras, the game has moved on almost unrecognisably from when players like Davis and White were youngsters/ in their prime.
Davis is ahead of Jimmy and maybe Higgins too in terms of impact. Higgins may have pulled snooker out of the backrooms (I personally think he’s given too much credit for this) but Davis pushed it into the world of professional sport in a way we still see today. And a lot of Jimmy’s impact was as a mirror to Davis.
But being an all-time great and being a giant are different things anyway. Dennis Taylor is one half of the seminal moment in snooker history. He’s absolutely a giant of the game. Is he a great? Is he buck.
-
Iranu
- Posts: 41460
- Joined: 24 January 2010
- Walk-On: Fort Knox - Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds
by Iranu » 28 Sep 2021 Read
orky wrote:What do you base you base your opinion on when you say he's not an all time great? Be interesting to know, not having a dig. He's defo an all time great but I can understand people under the age of 30 thinking he shouldn't be an all time great.
Well I’m not under 30*
He’s not an all-time great because ultimately he doesn’t have the CV for it. Is Parrott an all-time great? Is Murphy? Is Robertson? Robertson is the closest of the three but I don’t think he quite makes the cut.
To me, an all-time great would be something like “if you were to make an all-time tournament based on a player’s CV, who would be in the quarter finals?”
For me that would be: Davis, Hendry, O’Sullivan, J Higgins, Selby, Reardon, Mark Williams, and then a toss up between Spencer and Alex Higgins (I’d go for Higgins personally but I’ll admit a bias in that).
-
Iranu
- Posts: 41460
- Joined: 24 January 2010
- Walk-On: Fort Knox - Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds
by TheRocket » 28 Sep 2021 Read
If Jimmy is an All-Time Great then a low tier one. And thats the best case scenario.
No disrespect to him but sporting performance should be put above anything else and he did have a good career but its certainly not an All-Time Great CV. Obviously the lack of World titles is a big minus. So its mainly his popularity and entertaining style of play that gives him a chance to still be considered a Great.
-
TheRocket
- Posts: 16418
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
by SnookerEd25 » 28 Sep 2021 Read
Slightly off-topic though, the last few posts.
Is he an all-time great? no
But the original question in this thread - is he a giant of the game? 100% yes.
There is a difference.
-
SnookerEd25
- Posts: 18673
- Joined: 10 October 2011
- Location: West London
- Snooker Idol: Cliff Wilson
- Highest Break: 53
- Walk-On: Play with Fire (Rolling Stones)
by Iranu » 28 Sep 2021 Read
SnookerEd25 wrote:Slightly off-topic though, the last few posts.
Is he an all-time great? no
But the original question in this thread - is he a giant of the game? 100% yes.
There is a difference.
How dare you suggest I was off-topic, that was my entire point
And to ensure this post isn’t off-topic: while definitely a giant on Snooker Island, I would personally not consider SnookerEd a giant in snooker generally.
-
Iranu
- Posts: 41460
- Joined: 24 January 2010
- Walk-On: Fort Knox - Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds
by TheRocket » 28 Sep 2021 Read
SnookerEd25 wrote:Slightly off-topic though, the last few posts.
Is he an all-time great? no
But the original question in this thread - is he a giant of the game? 100% yes.
There is a difference.
I'd still argue that even "All-Time Great" is a little bit about legacy and the reputation as well
Maybe 80% CV and 20% legacy I'd say. And Jimmy certainly has the legacy part in him and thats why he is called Great by some pundits despite lacking the CV. But as I said, low tier one in best case scenario.
As for Giant of the game though. No doubt. He absolutely is.
-
TheRocket
- Posts: 16418
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
by orky » 28 Sep 2021 Read
I guess it's all subjective at the end of the day. I class him as an all time great mainly based on achievements at the table, not because of popularity etc. Lower tier all time great, yes. 10 raking titles from the eighties and early nineties (yes I take note of the surprise win in 2004) is worth probably 20+ rankers these days. There were so few rankers back in the eighties, steadily increasing over time. Funnily enough, had he won one of those 6 world finals wouldn't have made much difference to where I would place him on the all time greats list.
-
orky
- Posts: 118
- Joined: 20 March 2021
by SnookerEd25 » 29 Sep 2021 Read
Iranu wrote:SnookerEd25 wrote:Slightly off-topic though, the last few posts.
Is he an all-time great? no
But the original question in this thread - is he a giant of the game? 100% yes.
There is a difference.
How dare you suggest I was off-topic, that was my entire point
And to ensure this post isn’t off-topic: while definitely a giant on Snooker Island, I would personally not consider SnookerEd a giant in snooker generally.
You’re lucky I’m in a good mood tonight
And that I’m only four foot two
-
SnookerEd25
- Posts: 18673
- Joined: 10 October 2011
- Location: West London
- Snooker Idol: Cliff Wilson
- Highest Break: 53
- Walk-On: Play with Fire (Rolling Stones)