Post a reply

Re: This whole thing about Hearn punishing people with high

Postby Holden Chinaski

Iranu wrote:
Ash147 wrote:Speaking of Alan Chamberlain, this moment was also bucking funny. He seemed to have it in for Selby. rofl

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvkYm-RXRVc

I don't really know why Foulds and Everton have a problem with Chamberlain's conduct there.

They agree that he's legally right, they say he should be explaining the situation (which he actually does guys, if you weren't too busy talking about how he should to listen,) and they say he should have used his discretion.

What discretion? A player not knowing the rules isn't grounds for discretion, it's not like a slow play or miss situation where there's no obvious answer.

Chamberlain made the right call.

I agree. Chamberlain was right.

Re: This whole thing about Hearn punishing people with high

Postby Alex0paul

SnookerFan wrote:
Badsnookerplayer wrote:Dott should have potted the cue ball in a baulk pocket, thus restoring the points and the ball-in-hand situation.


I agree.


Or just let Selby play the next shot