HustleKing wrote:To that earlier post from Dancat, I voted for Selby. It was a tough call, but I just about went him. I can get your statement that no true snookerfan would vote for Selby over Higgins if achievements and consistency are your argument. However, if you think no one should go for Selby because of his tactical, often boring approach to many matches I would disagree, but i assume you go for Higgins because he's won more events and got further in events on average?
P.S. I was snake hissed when Selby beat Higgins in the 2017 WC, so no bias on my part
Hello Hustle... well my remark was tongue in cheek and more aimed at using Snookerfan's name.
It has nothing to do with Selby's style of play, I enjoy his matches. Yes - Higgins: achievements, stature, his all round game.