Pink Ball wrote:Sickpotter wrote:Ace wrote:Holden Chinaski wrote:Ace wrote:Nothing wrong in thinking Judd has taken the game to a new level, .
The only thing wrong with it is that it's NOT TRUE. I wis it was true, it would be amazing to see a player play better snooker than prime Hendry, Ronnie, and Higgins did. I would love that. But I have never seen it.
Then why is everyone saying it's the best standard there's been? Ronnie himself said it's better than his own game and Hendry's and Higgins, Higgins said he hasn't seen a talent like it, Davis said he wouldn't want to play Judd in the final and never seen such ferocious snooker etc
Are they all lying just because it's about Judd? If it was about Ronnie I bet you wouldn't disagree.
They are all hyping up the game and Judd as he's the new generation exciting player.
Judd played great in the final and deserved to win but I wouldn't say it was a better standard than we've seen before.
Higgins had a woeful season and while he produced patches of brilliance at the WC, he broke down on clearances far more than a prime Higgins ever would. Those clearances that Higgins is usually so good at (and which apply so much pressure to his opponent) were mostly absent from the final. IMO we got flashes of Johns B game but mostly his C game while Judd was definitely on his A game.
For the record I think Judd would've lost in every one of those proposed match ups by about the same margin.....18 (Hendry/ROS/Higgins) - 12 2019 Judd
I actually don’t agree with that. I’m honestly not sure if I’ve seen a better performance in a world final. And I’ve seen the lot of em.
If you haven't seen a better performance then why r u disagreeing with me lol
- Posts: 363
- Joined: 09 May 2019
- Snooker Idol: Judd Trump