Ace wrote:Holden Chinaski wrote:Ace wrote:Nothing wrong in thinking Judd has taken the game to a new level, .
The only thing wrong with it is that it's NOT TRUE. I wis it was true, it would be amazing to see a player play better snooker than prime Hendry, Ronnie, and Higgins did. I would love that. But I have never seen it.
Then why is everyone saying it's the best standard there's been? Ronnie himself said it's better than his own game and Hendry's and Higgins, Higgins said he hasn't seen a talent like it, Davis said he wouldn't want to play Judd in the final and never seen such ferocious snooker etc
Are they all lying just because it's about Judd? If it was about Ronnie I bet you wouldn't disagree.
They are praising Judd and hyping up snooker. Look at some old matches and you will see with your own eyes that it is not true. Not true at all. I'm done with this now. Go watch Ronnie in 2004, the 2005 Masters final, prime Hendry, prime Higgins... Watch the Charity final between Hendry and Ronnie... You will see it with your own eyes.
- Posts: 15200
- Joined: 26 July 2013
- Location: Belgium