Clara8633 wrote:Cannonball wrote:Clara8633 wrote:Cannonball wrote:Clara8633 wrote:Cannonball, your messages contain so much rubbish that I won't bother quoting them to reply
What sort of a Ronnie fan are you if you can't even get his number of centuries right? Especially since he's 50% of snooker
Go back to baking cakes. You don't and can't even play the game. This isn't Strictly love.
You should say that to yourself; don't you love ROS?
Selby fan!
I'm not yucky about my favourite player like you are. I bet if someone asked you who you cared about the most in this world, you'd say Ronnie O'Sullivan
Luck? What f***** luck, are you stupid? How does luck come into it? You are either like a player or you don't. I LOVE snooker, so I obviously love Ronnie, because by everyone I know, county players and pros included, he is considered the greatest of all time. Everyone I know has tried the Ronnie set-up and technique at some time. They do this for a reason. Robbo and Trump are now eclipsing him with a new technique, the hybrid set-up I call it. These are real snooker players, capable of playing the sort of shot in practice I'd be proud of, but under immense pressure. There aren't really any bad professional snooker players, they've all hit stacks of 147s in practice, this is a fact. But as Perry found out, you have to do it against the best in front of the crowd, cameras and lights. Not easy, it's about performing and there really is no hiding place in snooker. It's more focus on you than a stage and you have to play brilliantly on top. I think apart from darts, it's the most difficult thing to do in sport.
But to choose a robot as your favourite player. That is just sad.
Here's a fact; Wildey, You and Skull, you all love Selby. And none of you play snooker.