Post a reply

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby Chalk McHugh

SnookerFan wrote:
Chalk McHugh wrote:I haven't heard of anyone shelling peas lately.


What?



Snooker commentators mentioned that few times lately. Dont ask me why.

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby SnookerFan

Is that true of the referee in the Bingham vs Walden match?

They both needed a toilet break mid-frame, asked the referee, who misunderstood and re-racked when they were both gone. So they had to start the frame again, and Bingham hit a 147.

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby vodkadiet

Will any of Wilson, Robertson, or Hawkins get a more favourable projected last 16 Crucible draw by deliberately losing today?

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby vodkadiet

SnookerFan wrote:Is that true of the referee in the Bingham vs Walden match?

They both needed a toilet break mid-frame, asked the referee, who misunderstood and re-racked when they were both gone. So they had to start the frame again, and Bingham hit a 147.


Yes!

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby SnookerFan

vodkadiet wrote:
SnookerFan wrote:Is that true of the referee in the Bingham vs Walden match?

They both needed a toilet break mid-frame, asked the referee, who misunderstood and re-racked when they were both gone. So they had to start the frame again, and Bingham hit a 147.


Yes!


Very weak refereeing.

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby vodkadiet

SnookerFan wrote:
vodkadiet wrote:Bingham's Bursting Bladder Brings Bonanza!


Who was the referee? That's poor.


Ding Junhui's cousin.

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby vodkadiet

SnookerFan wrote:
vodkadiet wrote:
SnookerFan wrote:Is that true of the referee in the Bingham vs Walden match?

They both needed a toilet break mid-frame, asked the referee, who misunderstood and re-racked when they were both gone. So they had to start the frame again, and Bingham hit a 147.


Yes!


Very weak refereeing.


Very weak bladders!

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby SnookerFan

vodkadiet wrote:
SnookerFan wrote:
vodkadiet wrote:
SnookerFan wrote:Is that true of the referee in the Bingham vs Walden match?

They both needed a toilet break mid-frame, asked the referee, who misunderstood and re-racked when they were both gone. So they had to start the frame again, and Bingham hit a 147.


Yes!


Very weak refereeing.


Very weak bladders!


That's less of an issue.

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby vodkadiet

Chalk McHugh wrote:And when Bingo was in the loo he backed himself at 147/1 online to get a maximum in next frame.


:clap:

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby Chalk McHugh

vodkadiet wrote:
Chalk McHugh wrote:And when Bingo was in the loo he backed himself at 147/1 online to get a maximum in next frame.


:clap:


Bingos Beijing bonanza gets mote bizarre by the minute. He's takin the snake hiss!

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby vodkadiet

I've just texted Jan Verhaas telling him I need to urinate and could he please stop the frame and rerack the balls while I am gone.

Re: Fuhua Group China Open Semi Final !!!

Postby Chalk McHugh

vodkadiet wrote:I've just texted Jan Verhaas telling him I need to urinate and could he please stop the frame and rerack the balls while I am gone.



I haven't heard his phone beep. Must be poor signal.