Re: Championship League Snooker 2019 !!!
-
TheRocket - Posts: 16409
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
Ash147 wrote:This is just a glorified set of practice matches.
SnookerFan wrote:KrazeeEyezKilla wrote:Is there a reason why the darts Championshit League ended years ago but the Snooker keeps running?
Is darts as reliant on the gambling agencies as snooker?
Yes, they sponsor them a lot. But I'm sure more industries could be tempted to sponsor darts, such is the popularity of the sport.
Is this true of snooker?
Wildey wrote:What Makes you think Darts is more popular?
Maybe easier any one can hit a Dart board and play down to 0 from 501 much quicker than they could clear a snooker table
xSnookerFan wrote:Wildey wrote:What Makes you think Darts is more popular?
Maybe easier any one can hit a Dart board and play down to 0 from 501 much quicker than they could clear a snooker table
It attracts bigger crowds, thus it'd be easier to find new sponsors was the point.
Wildey wrote:xSnookerFan wrote:Wildey wrote:What Makes you think Darts is more popular?
Maybe easier any one can hit a Dart board and play down to 0 from 501 much quicker than they could clear a snooker table
It attracts bigger crowds, thus it'd be easier to find new sponsors was the point.
Seriously mate they could put on a knitting compatition and most wouldn't give a toss. They there to get snake hissed less than 50% are there to watch the darts.
SnookerFan wrote:Wildey wrote:xSnookerFan wrote:Wildey wrote:What Makes you think Darts is more popular?
Maybe easier any one can hit a Dart board and play down to 0 from 501 much quicker than they could clear a snooker table
It attracts bigger crowds, thus it'd be easier to find new sponsors was the point.
Seriously mate they could put on a knitting compatition and most wouldn't give a toss. They there to get snake hissed less than 50% are there to watch the darts.
Sponsors don't care about that. They care about how many people see their brand.
Badsnookerplayer wrote:Snooker is far superior to darts.
Badsnookerplayer wrote:Snooker is far superior to darts.
SnookerFan wrote:So, what's up in the CL? Presumably somebody has qualified from a group yet.
Andre147 wrote:SnookerFan wrote:So, what's up in the CL? Presumably somebody has qualified from a group yet.
Neil Robbo qualified.
SnookerFan wrote:Andre147 wrote:SnookerFan wrote:So, what's up in the CL? Presumably somebody has qualified from a group yet.
Neil Robbo qualified.
That'll harm his century statistics.
Alex0paul wrote:He’s qualified for the CoC so there was no incentive in winning the group
Wildey wrote:Alex0paul wrote:He’s qualified for the CoC so there was no incentive in winning the group
Who has?
Alex0paul wrote:Wildey wrote:Alex0paul wrote:He’s qualified for the CoC so there was no incentive in winning the group
Who has?
Robertson. Might as well play all the groups and make more money
Andre147 wrote:Lisowski won Group 2, beating Luca in 27 minutes in the Final.
I think that beats the fastest Best of 3 match, Ronnie had it when he beat Fergal here in 30 odd minutes.
Andre147 wrote:Lisowski won Group 2, beating Luca in 27 minutes in the Final.
I think that beats the fastest Best of 3 match, Ronnie had it when he beat Fergal here in 30 odd minutes.
Alex0paul wrote:Andre147 wrote:Lisowski won Group 2, beating Luca in 27 minutes in the Final.
I think that beats the fastest Best of 3 match, Ronnie had it when he beat Fergal here in 30 odd minutes.
Is it best of 3 now?!