Post a reply

Re: Race to the Crucible: Qualifying Round 3 (April 16th~17

Postby KrazeeEyezKilla

HappyCamper wrote:
KrazeeEyezKilla wrote:Do they have to start the evening session so early? I'll barely get to see any of it.


probably they want to avoid any matches going on into the wee small hours.


Yeah I can see that now. I just remember last year everything been done by eight o'clock.

Re: Race to the Crucible: Qualifying Round 3 (April 16th~17

Postby Andre147

Badsnookerplayer wrote:
Andre147 wrote:
Cloud Strife wrote:Always feel abit sorry for the loser in a match like this.


Yes... but that's sport, only one winner.

Not in doubles


Only one winner still, the doubles team.

Re: Race to the Crucible: Qualifying Round 3 (April 16th~17

Postby Iranu

Badsnookerplayer wrote:
Iranu wrote:I have to say, I don’t think simultaneous should be a foul.

It would make decisions like that simpler

It’s practically impossible to see in real-time whether two balls have been hit simultaneously. I also think it’s a bit harsh to call a foul when you haven’t hit the wrong ball first.

In this instance it looked pretty clearly blue first of course, so it wouldn’t make a differencs.