Betfred World Championship (Sat April 27th) Last 16 !!

As long as Cahill beat the 'Snooker Prima Donna' he can behave as he likes.


Snooker fans have had 2 decades of Ronnie O'Sulkivan dictating everything so well done to anyone who beats him. Mr James Cahill you are a hero to many.


Fanboys can please themselves.


Cahill > O'Sulkivan

MJW had his fairytale moment the last year. Thats all he could have asked for and I'm happy he won that third world title after 15 years of not winning any major.

He said it himself. Even if he doesnt win anything after that he won't care. (He obviously will but it aint gonna hurt that much).

Iranu wrote:For buck’s sake Ding. Scan your hardware for faults.

Robot analogy?

Worried this would happen but Ding can't prepare for just one tournament.

Deewee wrote:

Iranu wrote:

Souvent wrote:

Andre147 wrote:

Souvent wrote:I think young Cahill has career dysmorphia: he sees it as it should be in his warped mind (10 WC titles) and not as it really is (not much so far). Quite an arrogant attitude shown to journalists this afternoon.

what do you mean? what did he say? need to watch it.

https://twitter.com/ShamoonHafez/status ... 2377292800

I can only guess he’s unhappy with something the newspapers have printed/done.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/8932414/ ... s-airport/

That is low. Bit then it is the sun.

Andre147 wrote:

GJ wrote:Andre

Won't get that far

I know you like Kyren, I do too.

I even predicted to win, so we shall see... I wouldn't actually mind if Hawkins won the world title though.

+1

Don't blame Cahill telling the Sun to buck off

vodkadiet1 wrote:As long as Cahill beat the 'Snooker Prima Donna' he can behave as he likes.


Snooker fans have had 2 decades of Ronnie O'Sulkivan dictating everything so well done to anyone who beats him. Mr James Cahill you are a hero to many.


Fanboys can please themselves.


Cahill > O'Sulkivan

Did you borrow hendryfans keyboard?

vodkadiet1 wrote:Mr James Cahill you are a hero to many.

Something you'll never be. Move on.

Tables rubbish

Fans rubbish

All rubbish

Hope Yeulong can give grumpy drawers a good match

Badsnookerplayer wrote:Tables rubbish

Fans rubbish

All rubbish

The Players and Tour Championships were much better events.

D4P wrote:

Badsnookerplayer wrote:Tables rubbish

Fans rubbish

All rubbish

The Players and Tour Championships were much better events.

Quoi?

TheRocket wrote:

Souvent wrote:I think young Cahill has career dysmorphia: he sees it as it should be in his warped mind (10 WC titles) and not as it really is (not much so far). Quite an arrogant attitude shown to journalists this afternoon.

He was very arrogant after his first match. Even said things like he was made for the Crucible and stuff like that. I thought relax dude. You've achievend nothing in the game so far and whenever you beat Ding,Selby and now Ronnie you immediately lost in the first match.

He seems thoroughly unlikable. Another clown who thinks he's made it just because he happened to catch Ronnie O'Sullivan on a bad day.

Andre147 wrote:

carayip wrote:

Andre147 wrote:

TheRocket wrote:Perry,Swail. Now its Gilbert.

3 players to knock him out when he was defending champ.

No disrespect to either, but you'd expct at least one of them were a top player. The fact they arent shows MJW doesn't cope well defeding the title here.

Come on. MJW is 44 years of age now. It’s difficult enough to win one at that range of age, let alone 2 a row. He’s never going to win it again this year. It’s nothing to do with not coping well as defending champ

But he could have lost to a top player no? Anyway, he was never going to win it again thats for sure.

He could only lose who is in front of him, doesn’t matter if said player is classed as a top player or not.

I am just glad MJW said he will play next season. As long as he continues to play, he has a chance of winning more titles

Cloud Strife wrote:

TheRocket wrote:

Souvent wrote:I think young Cahill has career dysmorphia: he sees it as it should be in his warped mind (10 WC titles) and not as it really is (not much so far). Quite an arrogant attitude shown to journalists this afternoon.

He was very arrogant after his first match. Even said things like he was made for the Crucible and stuff like that. I thought relax dude. You've achievend nothing in the game so far and whenever you beat Ding,Selby and now Ronnie you immediately lost in the first match.

He seems thoroughly unlikable. Another clown who thinks he's made it just because he happened to catch Ronnie O'Sullivan on a bad day.

Don't lower yourselves to this level lads.

He beat your man - but that was his job.

What single thing has he done to deserve scorn?

Bitterness is not an attractive trait

mantorok wrote:

Deewee wrote:

Iranu wrote:

Souvent wrote:

Andre147 wrote:
what do you mean? what did he say? need to watch it.

https://twitter.com/ShamoonHafez/status ... 2377292800

I can only guess he’s unhappy with something the newspapers have printed/done.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/8932414/ ... s-airport/

That is low. Bit then it is the sun.

Is it true what the article says though?

A Trump Howitzer!

Cloud Strife wrote:

TheRocket wrote:

Souvent wrote:I think young Cahill has career dysmorphia: he sees it as it should be in his warped mind (10 WC titles) and not as it really is (not much so far). Quite an arrogant attitude shown to journalists this afternoon.

He was very arrogant after his first match. Even said things like he was made for the Crucible and stuff like that. I thought relax dude. You've achievend nothing in the game so far and whenever you beat Ding,Selby and now Ronnie you immediately lost in the first match.

He seems thoroughly unlikable. Another clown who thinks he's made it just because he happened to catch Ronnie O'Sullivan on a bad day.

I said yesterday he has had his David Gray moment in the 1st round. But I take that back. Because Gray actually beat a peak Ronnie O'Sullivan back then who did make 5 centuries.

Cahill only beat the shadow of Ronnie O'Sullivan. All that hype around him aint gonna change the reality. He played against two players who did strongly underperform against him. And yet he couldnt beat Maguire.

Trump will get to the final this year

Badsnookerplayer wrote:

Cloud Strife wrote:

TheRocket wrote:

Souvent wrote:I think young Cahill has career dysmorphia: he sees it as it should be in his warped mind (10 WC titles) and not as it really is (not much so far). Quite an arrogant attitude shown to journalists this afternoon.

He was very arrogant after his first match. Even said things like he was made for the Crucible and stuff like that. I thought relax dude. You've achievend nothing in the game so far and whenever you beat Ding,Selby and now Ronnie you immediately lost in the first match.

He seems thoroughly unlikable. Another clown who thinks he's made it just because he happened to catch Ronnie O'Sullivan on a bad day.

Don't lower yourselves to this level lads.

He beat your man - but that was his job.

What single thing has he done to deserve scorn?

Bitterness is not an attractive trait

TheRocket wrote:

Cloud Strife wrote:

TheRocket wrote:

Souvent wrote:I think young Cahill has career dysmorphia: he sees it as it should be in his warped mind (10 WC titles) and not as it really is (not much so far). Quite an arrogant attitude shown to journalists this afternoon.

He was very arrogant after his first match. Even said things like he was made for the Crucible and stuff like that. I thought relax dude. You've achievend nothing in the game so far and whenever you beat Ding,Selby and now Ronnie you immediately lost in the first match.

He seems thoroughly unlikable. Another clown who thinks he's made it just because he happened to catch Ronnie O'Sullivan on a bad day.

I said yesterday he has had his David Gray moment in the 1st round. But I take that back. Because Gray actually beat a peak Ronnie O'Sullivan back then who did make 5 centuries.

Cahill only beat the shadow of Ronnie O'Sullivan. All that hype around him aint gonna change the reality. He played against two players who did strongly underperform against him. And yet he couldnt beat Maguire.

Oh come on TR - you are always a very rational poster. He seems a nice lad isn't he?

Snooker Overdrive wrote:Trump will get to the final this year

Really going out on a limb there .....

TheRocket wrote:

Cloud Strife wrote:

TheRocket wrote:

Souvent wrote:I think young Cahill has career dysmorphia: he sees it as it should be in his warped mind (10 WC titles) and not as it really is (not much so far). Quite an arrogant attitude shown to journalists this afternoon.

He was very arrogant after his first match. Even said things like he was made for the Crucible and stuff like that. I thought relax dude. You've achievend nothing in the game so far and whenever you beat Ding,Selby and now Ronnie you immediately lost in the first match.

He seems thoroughly unlikable. Another clown who thinks he's made it just because he happened to catch Ronnie O'Sullivan on a bad day.

I said yesterday he has had his David Gray moment in the 1st round. But I take that back. Because Gray actually beat a peak Ronnie O'Sullivan back then who did make 5 centuries.

Cahill only beat the shadow of Ronnie O'Sullivan. All that hype around him aint gonna change the reality. He played against two players who did strongly underperform against him. And yet he couldnt beat Maguire.

I think comparing Cahill to David Gray is actually doing Gray a massive disservice here. Let's not forget Gray is a ranking event winner, UK finalist and has many match wins at the Crucible under his belt.

Judd seems to be giving Ding a decent few chances

Come on lads give young Cahill a break. He beat the greatest player ever in the most prestigious event ever. He is a part of snookers history now forever. If he never won another match imagine that on your C.V?

Cloud Strife wrote:

TheRocket wrote:

Cloud Strife wrote:

TheRocket wrote:

Souvent wrote:I think young Cahill has career dysmorphia: he sees it as it should be in his warped mind (10 WC titles) and not as it really is (not much so far). Quite an arrogant attitude shown to journalists this afternoon.

He was very arrogant after his first match. Even said things like he was made for the Crucible and stuff like that. I thought relax dude. You've achievend nothing in the game so far and whenever you beat Ding,Selby and now Ronnie you immediately lost in the first match.

He seems thoroughly unlikable. Another clown who thinks he's made it just because he happened to catch Ronnie O'Sullivan on a bad day.

I said yesterday he has had his David Gray moment in the 1st round. But I take that back. Because Gray actually beat a peak Ronnie O'Sullivan back then who did make 5 centuries.

Cahill only beat the shadow of Ronnie O'Sullivan. All that hype around him aint gonna change the reality. He played against two players who did strongly underperform against him. And yet he couldnt beat Maguire.

I think comparing Cahill to David Gray is actually doing Gray a massive disservice here. Let's not forget Gray is a ranking event winner, UK finalist and has many match wins at the Crucible under his belt.

He also used to be a good singer.

TheRocket wrote:

Cloud Strife wrote:

TheRocket wrote:

Souvent wrote:I think young Cahill has career dysmorphia: he sees it as it should be in his warped mind (10 WC titles) and not as it really is (not much so far). Quite an arrogant attitude shown to journalists this afternoon.

He was very arrogant after his first match. Even said things like he was made for the Crucible and stuff like that. I thought relax dude. You've achievend nothing in the game so far and whenever you beat Ding,Selby and now Ronnie you immediately lost in the first match.

He seems thoroughly unlikable. Another clown who thinks he's made it just because he happened to catch Ronnie O'Sullivan on a bad day.

I said yesterday he has had his David Gray moment in the 1st round. But I take that back. Because Gray actually beat a peak Ronnie O'Sullivan back then who did make 5 centuries.

Cahill only beat the shadow of Ronnie O'Sullivan. All that hype around him aint gonna change the reality. He played against two players who did strongly underperform against him. And yet he couldnt beat Maguire.

The hype is nothing new

https://www.bbc.com/sport/av/snooker/30314035

TheRocket wrote:Cahill only beat the shadow of Ronnie O'Sullivan. All that hype around him aint gonna change the reality. He played against two players who did strongly underperform against him. And yet he couldnt beat Maguire.

Ronnie and Mags were very beatable. Shouldn't believe his own hype he's only beaten players when they're out of form,