World Mixed Doubles Championship !!!

mack501 wrote:No, sequel of Allen v Evans.

BringBackTonyDrago wrote:So my understanding is that Selby was originally meant to play. Why did he pull out ??? He was relaxed with Allen who then pulled out due to Reanne. So who convinced Selby to play in it again ? Surely if he withdrew someone completely different should have taken his place ?

SnookerFan wrote:

BringBackTonyDrago wrote:So my understanding is that Selby was originally meant to play. Why did he pull out ??? He was relaxed with Allen who then pulled out due to Reanne. So who convinced Selby to play in it again ? Surely if he withdrew someone completely different should have taken his place ?

Did Allen not realise that there was a possibility that the most famous and accomplished woman's player might be taking part in the Mixed Doubles?

Iranu wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:

BringBackTonyDrago wrote:So my understanding is that Selby was originally meant to play. Why did he pull out ??? He was relaxed with Allen who then pulled out due to Reanne. So who convinced Selby to play in it again ? Surely if he withdrew someone completely different should have taken his place ?

Did Allen not realise that there was a possibility that the most famous and accomplished woman's player might be taking part in the Mixed Doubles?

Nowhere has it been stated that Mark Allen withdrew because of Reanne Evans.

This is how rubbish gets distorted and unsubstantiated rumours become “facts”.

BringBackTonyDrago wrote:So my understanding is that Selby was originally meant to play. Why did he pull out ??? He was relaxed with Allen who then pulled out due to Reanne. So who convinced Selby to play in it again ? Surely if he withdrew someone completely different should have taken his place ?

HappyCamper wrote:allen was ranked higher then selby

HappyCamper wrote:

BringBackTonyDrago wrote:So my understanding is that Selby was originally meant to play. Why did he pull out ??? He was relaxed with Allen who then pulled out due to Reanne. So who convinced Selby to play in it again ? Surely if he withdrew someone completely different should have taken his place ?

allen was ranked higher then selby at the time of draw. the male selection was robertson (defending champion), then numbers 2 through 4 in the rankings (trump, brecel, allen). number one o'sullivan elected not to participate.

we also don't know the reasons for allen's withdrawal.

SnookerEd25 wrote:

HappyCamper wrote:

BringBackTonyDrago wrote:So my understanding is that Selby was originally meant to play. Why did he pull out ??? He was relaxed with Allen who then pulled out due to Reanne. So who convinced Selby to play in it again ? Surely if he withdrew someone completely different should have taken his place ?

allen was ranked higher then selby at the time of draw. the male selection was robertson (defending champion), then numbers 2 through 4 in the rankings (trump, brecel, allen). number one o'sullivan elected not to participate.

we also don't know the reasons for allen's withdrawal.

I heard it was because Reanne is playing

Juddernaut88 wrote:

mantorok wrote:

Juddernaut88 wrote:This tournament should have been played in like August or September. It's too much of an inconvenience having this right before the Tour championship! Whoever thought it was a good idea to schedule this tournament at the end of March is an idiot!

Who does it inconvenience? It's played in the same arena as the TC.

Inconvenience for Judd. He should be pulling out of this.

SnookerFan wrote:Is there any truth to the rumour that Reanne has pulled out, and Mark Allen is back in?

SnookerFan wrote:I have a film on.

D4P wrote:

SnookerFan wrote:I have a film on.

Is it a masterpiece? Are you wataching it?

Me and the Table wrote:Horrible first frame.

LC wrote:Even Robertson missing by miles