by TheRocket » 03 May 2016 Read
2 World titles, 3 Masters titles and one UK title. 7 ranking titles. As of today.
In terms of triple crown titles he probably has done just enough. Like MJW. Only 7 ranking titles though are a big weak point but he still has time to do something about that.
So what do you think?
-
![User avatar](https://www.simpleimageresizer.com/_uploads/photos/429a9d34/rsz_sei_152324995-d157_1_120x120.jpg)
TheRocket
- Posts: 16445
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
by vodkadiet » 03 May 2016 Read
Anyone who talks about football in his winners speech is a loser. Selby has served his purpose.
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=260_1429055008.jpg)
vodkadiet
- Posts: 9421
- Joined: 05 September 2010
- Location: Zanzibar
- Snooker Idol: Gino Rigitano
- Highest Break: 48
- Walk-On: Broken Wings
by sas6789 » 03 May 2016 Read
My personal opinion, no not as yet, he only has 7 ranking titles. If he wins a few more then he could be in the discussion. Some facts to look at is Robertson and Ding have more ranking titles, centuries and 147's than Selby.
-
sas6789
- Posts: 456
- Joined: 06 June 2014
by TheSaviour » 04 May 2016 Read
This is one of these cases similar to when the Mughal emperor Babur once called mango the "finest fruit of Hindostan." Where these days in India hundreds of varieties, with exotic names and pedigrees of mangos, are available.
-
TheSaviour
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: 27 May 2014
- Location: Vandalising is boring when you have nothing to say.
- Snooker Idol: At times David Gilbert.
- Highest Break: 147
by Clara8633 » 04 May 2016 Read
TheSaviour wrote:This is one of these cases similar to when the Mughal emperor Babur once called mango the "finest fruit of Hindostan." Where these days in India hundreds of varieties, with exotic names and pedigrees of mangos, are available.
![good post :goodpost:](./images/smilies/animated/252.gif)
-
Clara8633
- Posts: 2164
- Joined: 25 September 2014
- Snooker Idol: Mark Anthony Selby
- Walk-On: Furtado - All Good Things
by V.V » 04 May 2016 Read
He still needs to win at least 5 ranking tournaments OR two triple crown OR one WC in order to be concidered as one of the greatest. I think he seems to be some kind of a WC specialist these days. Other merits should be added to his CV. He has not won UK or Masters after the first WC. That seems odd to me. WC specialist, that is what he is these days.
-
V.V
- Posts: 88
- Joined: 13 January 2015
by PoolBoy » 04 May 2016 Read
Depends what "all-time great" actually means! Does it mean the top 5 players ever in the sport? Then NO.
Does it mean, a player who has won more than one World Championship in their chosen sport? Then YES.
Does it mean the top 15 players ever in the sport? Then YES.
I suppose it simply depends on how many "greats" are considered. People have different ideas - there was a debate about whether the player at number 6 in the World could be considered as being at the elite end of the game. Incredibly some thought not! But, that's because the player in question at the time was Mark Allen.
It's probably much the same here - if you don't like Selby, you won't vote YES and vice versa!
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=3163_1397493421.jpg)
PoolBoy
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: 14 April 2014
- Location: Inverness
by V.V » 04 May 2016 Read
I think that the number of players that can be considered as all time greatest is contingent matter: it depends on how many players achieve enough. For example, if there were ten players that have together won every possible tournament (no one else has won anything) then there could be ten all time greatest players (if the distribution of victories is even). Or there could be one, if only one guy has won almost all the titles.
Now there are five all time greatest in our actual world. These guys have done enough to be considered as greatests.
The point: It does not matter wether one is top5 or top15 player in achievments. The absolut amount of tournaments and triple crowns won matters.
-
V.V
- Posts: 88
- Joined: 13 January 2015
by Wildey » 20 May 2016 Read
No he isnt yet
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=61_1327436103.jpg)
Wildey
- Posts: 64485
- Joined: 02 October 2009
- Location: North Wales
- Snooker Idol: Mark Selby
- Highest Break: 25
- Walk-On: the one and only
by Dan-cat » 20 May 2016 Read
Wildey wrote:No he isnt yet
He's defo on the way
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=3011_1681935905.jpg)
Dan-cat
- Posts: 31533
- Joined: 20 August 2013
- Location: Shoreditch, London
- Snooker Idol: The Rocket + The Nugget
- Highest Break: 53
- Walk-On: www.instagram.com/dan_cat
-
by vodkadiet » 21 May 2016 Read
What does great mean? It is just a matter of opinion.
Results are what count.
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=260_1429055008.jpg)
vodkadiet
- Posts: 9421
- Joined: 05 September 2010
- Location: Zanzibar
- Snooker Idol: Gino Rigitano
- Highest Break: 48
- Walk-On: Broken Wings
by Ronnie79 » 09 Jun 2016 Read
Surely any player that wins the triple crown is an all time great imo. Jimmy only won 2 is lauded as one of the greats so why not he has won enough titles now
-
Ronnie79
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: 06 May 2014
by Andy Spark » 19 Jun 2016 Read
If you ignore the small-fry best of seven minor rankers, then Selby has won only eleven professional tournaments in his life. Eleven! That's an average of less than one a season. Is this a sign of the future of snooker's number ones I wonder. It's not as if he hasn't played enough tournaments, he's played hundreds. And yet in tournament XYZ* we STILL get, "gosh, that's a shock, Selby loses his third round match".
I'll tell you what WOULD be a statistical shock...if he wins tournament XYZ*!
(* not a real tournament called XYZ, just an indication of any tournament.)
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=494_1394842630.jpg)
Andy Spark
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: 29 May 2011
- Location: Bournemouth
- Snooker Idol: Ronnie Luca and Thais
- Highest Break: 78
- Walk-On: Alkan: piano etude op.35 no.12
by Sickpotter » 22 Jun 2016 Read
Ronnie79 wrote:Surely any player that wins the triple crown is an all time great imo. Jimmy only won 2 is lauded as one of the greats so why not he has won enough titles now
Jimmy is an all time great for more than his ranking wins. Longevity, entertaining style, the peoples champion, 6 time WC finalist, 10 ranking wins, 20 non-ranking.
Selby is no Jimmy but has time to make the list of all time greats.
-
Sickpotter
- Posts: 1527
- Joined: 05 October 2009
- Location: Toronto
- Snooker Idol: White-Hendry-ROS
- Highest Break: 147
by PoolBoy » 22 Jun 2016 Read
Jimmy White. 0 World titles and never ranked no.1.
Mark Selby. 2 World titles and 5 times season-ending ranked no.1.
To suggest that Jimmy's an all-time-great, while Selby isn't, is preposterous!
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=3163_1397493421.jpg)
PoolBoy
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: 14 April 2014
- Location: Inverness
by Sickpotter » 27 Jun 2016 Read
PoolBoy wrote:Jimmy White. 0 World titles and never ranked no.1.
Mark Selby. 2 World titles and 5 times season-ending ranked no.1.
To suggest that Jimmy's an all-time-great, while Selby isn't, is preposterous!
White was never world number one but rankings weren't money based when he was a contender. If they had been I suspect Jimmy would've had the number 1 spot at least once.
White also had the pleasure of competing against the two most prolific winners/professional sportsmen the game has ever seen, Davis and Hendry.
Selby is still a ways back from Jimmy title wise, popularity wise, style wise and needs to play another 20 years to approach Jimmys longevity.
Selby's close but I just don't have him on my ATG list yet.
-
Sickpotter
- Posts: 1527
- Joined: 05 October 2009
- Location: Toronto
- Snooker Idol: White-Hendry-ROS
- Highest Break: 147
by PoolBoy » 27 Jun 2016 Read
Sorry, but 'style' and 'popularity' have absolutely no relevance!
Selby has multiple wins of the tournament Jimmy admits he most wanted to win.
I find it very hard to see Jimmy White rated higher than Mark Selby in the all-time rankings!
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=3163_1397493421.jpg)
PoolBoy
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: 14 April 2014
- Location: Inverness
by SnookerFan » 07 Jul 2016 Read
I voted yes.
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=95_1683017862.jpg)
SnookerFan
- Posts: 151141
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by SnookerFan » 07 Jul 2016 Read
sas6789 wrote:My personal opinion, no not as yet, he only has 7 ranking titles. If he wins a few more then he could be in the discussion. Some facts to look at is Robertson and Ding have more ranking titles, centuries and 147's than Selby.
Ding has two less World Titles. Could be considered a point against.
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=95_1683017862.jpg)
SnookerFan
- Posts: 151141
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-
by sas6789 » 04 Dec 2016 Read
SnookerFan wrote:sas6789 wrote:My personal opinion, no not as yet, he only has 7 ranking titles. If he wins a few more then he could be in the discussion. Some facts to look at is Robertson and Ding have more ranking titles, centuries and 147's than Selby.
Ding has two less World Titles. Could be considered a point against.
Now that's he's won all three triple crowns multiple times, he should be in the discussion IMO.
-
sas6789
- Posts: 456
- Joined: 06 June 2014
by Alex0paul » 05 Dec 2016 Read
What does he need to do to go ahead of Williams in everyone's opinion?
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=91_1669733810.png)
Alex0paul
- Posts: 27313
- Joined: 03 December 2009
- Location: Plymouth
- Snooker Idol: Graeme Dott Joe OConnor
- Highest Break: 97
- Walk-On: Loco in Acapulco
by TheRocket » 05 Dec 2016 Read
Alex0paul wrote:What does he need to do to go ahead of Williams in everyone's opinion?
Selby has won one more Masters title but Williams has won 8 more rankers. So atm they are like equal. Depends on what you think is the bigger achievement. I'd say 8 more ranking titles is more worth than one more Masters.
However. In the end there will be no debate anyway. Selby has many years in front of him. Many more titles including TC titles to come which will put him ahead of Williams for good.
-
![User avatar](https://www.simpleimageresizer.com/_uploads/photos/429a9d34/rsz_sei_152324995-d157_1_120x120.jpg)
TheRocket
- Posts: 16445
- Joined: 23 September 2012
- Snooker Idol: Federer-ROS-Messi
by Alex0paul » 05 Dec 2016 Read
I think Selby will win another 8 rankers easily. Would be good to see him have a good tilt at holding the 4 majors all at once
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=91_1669733810.png)
Alex0paul
- Posts: 27313
- Joined: 03 December 2009
- Location: Plymouth
- Snooker Idol: Graeme Dott Joe OConnor
- Highest Break: 97
- Walk-On: Loco in Acapulco
by Pink Ball » 05 Dec 2016 Read
Alex0paul wrote:I think Selby will win another 8 rankers easily. Would be good to see him have a good tilt at holding the 4 majors all at once
He probably will, yes, but he has to actually do it first. Also, this is a much weaker era than the one that Williams had to carve his legacy in.
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=3440_1635544283.jpg)
Pink Ball
- Posts: 22345
- Joined: 07 April 2015
- Location: Galway city, Ireland
- Snooker Idol: You are a banker
- Walk-On: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkfgIUiCiUQ
by TheSaviour » 05 Dec 2016 Read
He reacts right when he gets beat by some on-song player. He feels humiliated and want´s to get it right immediately when the next tournament starts. He really fancies to go all the way. The runner-up is not good enough but to go all the way to bounce back. Can´t blame him for that. Only he can really do that. Obviously everything is based on of being a hugely skilled and resilient player.
-
TheSaviour
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: 27 May 2014
- Location: Vandalising is boring when you have nothing to say.
- Snooker Idol: At times David Gilbert.
- Highest Break: 147
by davisfan » 05 Dec 2016 Read
Alex0paul wrote:I think Selby will win another 8 rankers easily. Would be good to see him have a good tilt at holding the 4 majors all at once
Nope. Not a chance. He's already at the high water mark (no pun intended).
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=3418_1428589309.png)
davisfan
- Posts: 136
- Joined: 04 March 2015
- Snooker Idol: Bob Chaperon
- Walk-On: Kid Rock - American Badass
by Cheshire Cat » 06 Dec 2016 Read
Willie Thorne on 5 Live declares that Mark Selby is one of the top 5 players in the history of the game. That would turn my list into:
1) Stephen Hendry and Ronnie O'Sullivan
3) Steve Davis
4) John Higgins
5) ...Mark Selby?
Mark Selby above Mark Williams? Above Ray Reardon? Above Joe Davis? I don't think so.
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=3365_1513548976.jpg)
Cheshire Cat
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: 17 January 2015
- Location: Northern Ireland
- Snooker Idol: Alice in Wonderland
- Walk-On: Champion - Clement Marfo & Frontline
by Pink Ball » 06 Dec 2016 Read
Cheshire Cat wrote:Willie Thorne on 5 Live declares that Mark Selby is one of the top 5 players in the history of the game. That would turn my list into:
1) Stephen Hendry and Ronnie O'Sullivan
3) Steve Davis
4) John Higgins
5) ...Mark Selby?
Mark Selby above Mark Williams? Above Ray Reardon? Above Joe Davis? I don't think so.
Yeah it's nonsense, but it's Thorne.
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=3440_1635544283.jpg)
Pink Ball
- Posts: 22345
- Joined: 07 April 2015
- Location: Galway city, Ireland
- Snooker Idol: You are a banker
- Walk-On: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkfgIUiCiUQ
by SnookerFan » 06 Dec 2016 Read
-
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=95_1683017862.jpg)
SnookerFan
- Posts: 151141
- Joined: 13 December 2009
- Snooker Idol: Michaela Tabb
- Walk-On: Entry Of The Gladiators
-